Gerry's latest tweet to get some attention was one that he sent out today saying the "#IowaCaucus will draw fewer voters than local elections in Fairfax County. Little diversity in state. Media attention is just shy of obscene." In other words, Connolly's not the biggest fan of the Iowa Caucuses.
Jokingly pointing out that he's probably now given up any chance of receiving the Democratic nomination for president, the Washington Post highlighted how the numbers Gerry used do prove correct.
For the record, Connolly’s turnout comparison is correct if only Republicans are counted. In 2008, 119,000 Republicans and 236,000 Democrats showed up for the Iowa caucus. (That year saw competitive contests in both parties, whereas only the Republican side will be relevant this year.)If you watched some of the morning news programs today, you probably also realized that Gerry isn't alone in his belief that the "media attention is just shy of obscene." On Morning Joe, for instance, Mika pointed out that "there are more cameras than caucusers" at most of the events she's attended. Even Joe Scarborough mentioned how he doesn't see many yard signs or other indicators of strong public interest in the caucuses.
This all leads up to the question of whether Iowa should really have this much influence in the presidential campaign. It certainly looks like Gerry Connolly doesn't think so.
No comments:
Post a Comment